4.4 Article

Geochemical fractionation and ecological risks assessment of benthic sediment-bound heavy metals from coastal ecosystems off the Equatorial Atlantic Ocean

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SEDIMENT RESEARCH
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages 410-420

Publisher

IRTCES
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsrc.2017.07.007

Keywords

Speciation; Heavy metal pollution; Ecological risk assessment; Contamination indicators; Spatial distribution

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study determines the pollution, fractionation, and ecological risks of sediment-bound heavy metals from coastal ecosystems off the Equatorial Atlantic Ocean. Contamination Factor (CF), pollution load index (PLI), and geoaccumulation index (Igeo) were used to assess the extent of the heavy metal pollution, while the potential ecological risk was evaluated using the risks assessment code (RAC) and Hakanson potential ecological risk. The analysis revealed concentrations (mg/g, dw) of the cadmium (Cd), chromium (Cr), copper (Cu), nickel (Ni), and lead (Pb) in sediments for wet and dry seasons vary from 4.40-5.08, 14.80-21.09, 35.03-44.8, 2.14-2.28, and 172.24-196.39, respectively. The results also showed that the metal fractionation percentages in the residual, oxidizable, and reducible fractions are the most significant, while the exchangeable and carbonate bound trace metals are relatively low. The RAC values indicate no risk for Cd and Ni and low risk for other metals at all the studied sites during both seasons. Potential ecological risk analysis of the heavy metal concentrations indicates that Cd had high individual potential ecological risk, while the other metals have low risk at all investigated sites. The multi-elemental potential ecological risk indices (R-1) indicate high ecological risk in all the ecosystems. (C) 2017 International Research and Training Centre on Erosion and Sedimentation/the World Association for Sedimentation and Erosion Research. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available