4.3 Article

Single nucleotide polymorphisms of autophagy-related 16-like 1 gene are associated with ankylosing spondylitis in females: a case-control study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RHEUMATIC DISEASES
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 322-329

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1756-185X.13183

Keywords

ankylosing spondylitis; ATG16L1; gene; polymorphism

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [30771849, 30972530, 81273169, 81573218]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimsTo investigate the associations of autophagy-related 16-like 1 (ATG16L1) gene single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in a Chinese Han population. MethodsSix hundred and forty-nine AS patients from the First Affiliation Hospital of Anhui Medical University and 628 matched controls were selected. Genotyping for five SNPs in the ATG16L1 gene (rs4663421, rs2241880, rs4663396, rs6758317 and rs6431655) was performed using the improved multiplex ligase detection reaction (iMLDR) method. Haplotypes were built after linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis. All analyses were stratified by gender. ResultsSignificant differences in the genotype frequencies at rs4663421 were found between female AS patients and female controls (P=0.033). The frequencies of allele G of rs4663421 and allele C of rs6758317 were lower in AS patients than controls (odds ratio [OR]=0.391, 95% CI=0.175-0.876, P=0.019; OR=0.499, 95% CI=0.263-0.949, P=0.032, respectively) in females. However, no association remained significant after Bonferroni correction. rs4663396 and rs6758317 have been tested in high LD, and were used to construct three haplotypes: ht1 (CC), ht2 (TT) and ht3 (CT). The frequency of ht2 (TT) haplotype was higher in AS patients than controls (OR=2.003, 95% CI=1.053-3.808, P=0.032) in females; similarly, no association existed after Bonferroni correction. ConclusionsTwo SNPs (rs4663421 and rs6758317) and the TT haplotype of the ATG16L1 gene are possibly associated with AS susceptibility in a Chinese Han female population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available