3.8 Article

Assessment of Glycemic Control Protocol (STAR) Through Compliance Analysis Amongst Malaysian ICU Patients

Journal

MEDICAL DEVICES-EVIDENCE AND RESEARCH
Volume 13, Issue -, Pages 39-49

Publisher

DOVE MEDICAL PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S231856

Keywords

compliance; glycemic control; diabetes; stochastic targeted prediction; model-based control

Funding

  1. Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN) internal grant (UNIIG)
  2. Universiti Tenaga Nasional (UNITEN) internal grant (BOLD)
  3. Ministry of Higher Education through Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: This paper presents an assessment of an automated and personalized stochastic targeted (STAR) glycemic control protocol compliance in Malaysian intensive care unit (ICU) patients to ensure an optimized usage. Patients and Methods: STAR proposes 1-3 hours treatment based on individual insulin sensitivity variation and history of blood glucose, insulin, and nutrition. A total of 136 patients recorded data from STAR pilot trial in Malaysia (2017-quarter of 2019*) were used in the study to identify the gap between chosen administered insulin and nutrition intervention as recommended by STAR, and the real intervention performed. Results: The results show the percentage of insulin compliance increased from 2017 to first quarter of 2019* and fluctuated in feed administrations. Overall compliance amounted to 98.8% and 97.7% for administered insulin and feed, respectively. There was higher average of 17 blood glucose measurements per day than in other centres that have been using STAR, but longer intervals were selected when recommended. Control safety and performance were similar for all periods showing no obvious correlation to compliance. Conclusion: The results indicate that STAR, an automated model-based protocol is positively accepted among the Malaysian ICU clinicians to automate glycemic control and the usage can be extended to other hospitals already. Performance could be improved with several propositions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available