4.5 Article

Using γ rays to disentangle fusion-fission and quasifission near the Coulomb barrier: A test of principle in the fusion-fission and quasielastic channels

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW C
Volume 101, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.101.064612

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN, Italy)
  2. FLNR
  3. JINR
  4. IN2P3-JINR Agreements [14-90, 00-50]
  5. ENSAR2 Project [N-SI-88]
  6. Romania to the Joint Institute of Nuclear Research (JINR-RO) [03-5-1094-2010/2016, 03-51130-2017/2021]
  7. Polish National Science Centre [2013/08/M/ST2/00257]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The overlap in the mass symmetric region of the reaction products from fusion-fission and quasifission complicates the assignment of symmetric events to complete fusion on the basis of the mass distribution alone. Additional observables, besides mass distribution, should be used. The approach proposed here relies on the fact that fusion-fission and quasifission are characterized by different timescales. Within this framework, we performed a detailed study to find out how timescales can be probed via angular momentum transfer as measured via gamma-ray multiplicities. The proof of principle was carried out by measuring the gamma rays in coincidence with fusion-fission and quasielastic binary fragments in the reaction S-32 + Au-197 at beam energy near the Coulomb barrier. The experiment was performed at the Accelerateur Lineaire Tandem a Orsay (ALTO) facility at the Institut De Physique Nucleaire (IPN) in Orsay (France) using a detection setup consisting of ORGAM (ORsay GAMma) and PARIS (Photon Array Radioactive Ion Stable beams) gamma-detectors arrays coupled with the CORSET (CORrelation SETup) time-of-flight spectrometer. Results of the sensitivity of this method to distinguish reaction channels with different dynamics are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available