4.5 Review

Effects of ionizing radiation on DNA methylation: from experimental biology to clinical applications

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY
Volume 93, Issue 5, Pages 457-469

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/09553002.2017.1287454

Keywords

Epigenetics; ionizing radiation; DNA methylation; radiotherapy; space radiation; transposable elements

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [1P20GM109005]
  2. NIH/UAMS Clinical and Translational Science Award [UL1TR000039, KL2TR000063]
  3. Arkansas Biosciences Institute
  4. National Space Biomedical Research Institute through the National Aeronautics and Space Administration NCC 9-58 [RE03701]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: Ionizing radiation (IR) is a ubiquitous environmental stressor with genotoxic and epigenotoxic capabilities. Terrestrial IR, predominantly a low-linear energy transfer (LET) radiation, is being widely utilized in medicine, as well as in multiple industrial applications. Additionally, an interest in understanding the effects of high-LET irradiation is emerging due to the potential of exposure during space missions and the growing utilization of high-LET radiation in medicine.Conclusions: In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of the effects of IR on DNA methylation, a key epigenetic mechanism regulating the expression of genetic information. We discuss global, repetitive elements and gene-specific DNA methylation in light of exposure to high and low doses of high- or low-LET IR, fractionated IR exposure, and bystander effects. Finally, we describe the mechanisms of IR-induced alterations to DNA methylation and discuss ways in which that understanding can be applied clinically, including utilization of DNA methylation as a predictor of response to radiotherapy and in the manipulation of DNA methylation patterns for tumor radiosensitization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available