4.5 Article

Retinal Dystrophies and the Road to Treatment: Clinical Requirements and Considerations

Journal

ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 159-179

Publisher

ASIA-PACIFIC ACAD OPHTHALMOLOGY-APAO
DOI: 10.1097/APO.0000000000000290

Keywords

antisense oligonucleotides; gene therapy; genetics; inherited retinal dystrophies; stem cell therapy

Categories

Funding

  1. Curing Retinal Blindness Foundation
  2. Janivo Stichting
  3. Stichting Blindenhulp

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Retinal dystrophies (RDs) comprise relatively rare but devastating causes of progressive vision loss. They represent a spectrum of diseases with marked genetic and clinical heterogeneity. Mutations in the same gene may lead to different diagnoses, for example, retinitis pigmentosa or cone dystrophy. Conversely, mutations in different genes may lead to the same phenotype. The age at symptom onset, and the rate and characteristics of peripheral and central vision decline, may vary widely per disease group and even within families. For most RD cases, no effective treatment is currently available. However, preclinical studies and phase I/II/III gene therapy trials are ongoing for several RD subtypes, and recently the first retinal gene therapy has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for RPE65-associated RDs: voretigene neparvovec-rzyl (Luxturna). With the rapid advances in gene therapy studies, insight into the phenotypic spectrum and long-term disease course is crucial information for several RD types. The vast clinical heterogeneity presents another important challenge in the evaluation of potential efficacy in future treatment trials, and in establishing treatment candidacy criteria. This perspective describes these challenges, providing detailed clinical descriptions of several forms of RD that are caused by genes of interest for ongoing and future gene or cell-based therapy trials. Several ongoing and future treatment options will be described.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available