4.4 Article

General concepts, assumptions, drawbacks, and misuses in kinetic Monte Carlo and microkinetic modeling simulations applied to computational heterogeneous catalysis

Journal

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/qua.25518

Keywords

computational heterogeneous catalysis; energy and free energy diagrams; kinetic Monte Carlo and microkinetic modeling; reaction rates

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [CTQ2014-53987-R, CTQ2015-64618-R]
  2. Generalitat de Catalunya [2014SGR97, 2014SGR1582, FI-DGR-2015, XRQTC]
  3. ICREA Academia Award for Excellence in University Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the present article, we survey two common approaches widely used to study the kinetics of heterogeneous catalytic reactions. These are kinetic Monte Carlo simulations and microkinetic modeling. We discuss typical assumptions, advantages, drawbacks, and differences of these two methodologies. We also illustrate some wrong concepts and inaccurate procedures used too often in this kind of kinetics studies. Thus, several issues as for instance minimum energy diagrams, diffusion processes, lateral interactions, or the accuracy of the reaction rates are discussed. Some own examples mainly based on water gas shift reaction over Cu(111) and Cu(321) surfaces are chosen to explain the different developed topics on the kinetics of heterogeneous catalytic reactions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available