4.8 Article

Causal inference and counterfactual prediction in machine learning for actionable healthcare

Journal

NATURE MACHINE INTELLIGENCE
Volume 2, Issue 7, Pages 369-375

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42256-020-0197-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. University of Florida (UF)'s Creating the Healthiest Generation-Moonshot initiative
  2. UF Office of the Provost
  3. UF Office of Research
  4. UF Health
  5. UF College of Medicine
  6. UF Clinical and Translational Science Institute
  7. Lanzillotti-McKethan Eminent Scholar Endowment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Big data, high-performance computing, and (deep) machine learning are increasingly becoming key to precision medicine-from identifying disease risks and taking preventive measures, to making diagnoses and personalizing treatment for individuals. Precision medicine, however, is not only about predicting risks and outcomes, but also about weighing interventions. Interventional clinical predictive models require the correct specification of cause and effect, and the calculation of so-called counterfactuals, that is, alternative scenarios. In biomedical research, observational studies are commonly affected by confounding and selection bias. Without robust assumptions, often requiring a priori domain knowledge, causal inference is not feasible. Data-driven prediction models are often mistakenly used to draw causal effects, but neither their parameters nor their predictions necessarily have a causal interpretation. Therefore, the premise that data-driven prediction models lead to trustable decisions/interventions for precision medicine is questionable. When pursuing intervention modelling, the bio-health informatics community needs to employ causal approaches and learn causal structures. Here we discuss how target trials (algorithmic emulation of randomized studies), transportability (the licence to transfer causal effects from one population to another) and prediction invariance (where a true causal model is contained in the set of all prediction models whose accuracy does not vary across different settings) are linchpins to developing and testing intervention models. Machine learning models are commonly used to predict risks and outcomes in biomedical research. But healthcare often requires information about cause-effect relations and alternative scenarios, that is, counterfactuals. Prosperi et al. discuss the importance of interventional and counterfactual models, as opposed to purely predictive models, in the context of precision medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available