4.7 Article

Quick response strategy with cleaner technology in a supply chain: coordination and win-win situation analysis

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH
Volume 56, Issue 10, Pages 3397-3408

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1278283

Keywords

quick response manufacturing; supply chain coordination; sustainability; sustainable supply chain; Bayesian theory

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71401029]
  2. Chenguang Programme [15CG34]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quick response strategy (QRS) has been widely adopted in a supply chain where members collect timely market information for better forecasting, and then respond promptly to the market changes by adjusting initial inventory decision. After adopting the QRS, sustainability issues such as greenhouse gas emission and energy waste may be more serious as production lead time is shorter. In this study, due to this dilemma, we develop a two-stage quick response supply chain with cleaner technology, where the manufacturer determines the cleaner technology investment and afterwards the retailer decides the ordering quantity. Based on Bayesian theory, we depict an information updating process for the QRS with cleaner technology. First, we find that the inventory service level significantly affects both manufacturer's and retailer's performance under the QRS with cleaner technology. Moreover, our analytical results indicate that the performance of centralised supply chain system is always better than the decentralised one. As a result, we propose two supply chain contracts, minimum ordering quantity (MOQ) and MOQ with buyback (MOQ-BB) to achieve supply chain coordination. Comparing with the MOQ, the MOQ-BB is more flexible to allow better allocation of the additional' expected profit between the channel members through the buyback price negotiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available