4.6 Article

Pricing and lot-sizing polices for perishable goods when the demand depends on selling price, displayed stocks, and expiration date

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS
Volume 185, Issue -, Pages 11-20

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.017

Keywords

Inventory control; Pricing; Lot-sizing; Perishable products; Expiration date

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [71601162]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [26816WBR01]
  3. National Science Council of the Republic of China [NSC-105-2420-H-468-004-MY2]
  4. Tecnologico de Monterrey Research Group in Industrial Engineering and Numerical Methods [0822B01006]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Price is a major factor on the demand based on marketing and economic theory. In addition, the demand for perishable products also depends on its freshness. Moreover, it is a well-known fact that increasing stock display (e.g., fresh fruits, vegetables, baked goods) may encourage consumers to purchase more. This paper first proposes an inventory model that stipulates the demand explicitly in a multivariate function of price, freshness, and displayed stocks. It may be profitable to have a closeout sale at a markdown price, and always keep on -hand displayed stocks fresh and plentiful if the demand is freshness-and-stock dependent. Hence, the traditional assumption of zero ending inventories is relaxed to a non-zero ending inventory. As a result, the objective is to determine three decision variables (i.e., unit price, cycle time, and ending-inventory level) in order to maximize the total profit. Then it is demonstrated that the total profit is strictly pseudo-concave in those three decision variables, which reduces the search for solutions to a unique local maximum. Finally, numerical examples to illustrate the theoretical results and to highlight managerial insights are presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available