Correction

Energy storage in long-term system models: a review of considerations, best practices, and research needs

Journal

PROGRESS IN ENERGY
Volume 2, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

IOP Publishing Ltd
DOI: 10.1088/2516-1083/ab9894

Keywords

energy storage; energy systems modeling; capacity planning; renewable integration; power sector economics; metamodeling

Categories

Funding

  1. The authors would like to thank Paul Donohoo-Vallett, Matthias Fripp, David Hunter, Jeb Stenhouse, Laura Vimmerstedt, two anonymous reviewers, as well as participants in two workshops, for helpful comments and feedback. All errors are our own. The views ex [DE-AC36-08GO28308]
  2. US Department of Energy Solar Energy Technology Office, Office of Strategic Programs, Water Power Technology Office, and Wind Energy Technology Office

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Technological change and policy support have heightened expectations for the role of energy storage in power systems, creating a need to enhance representations of energy storage in long-term models to inform decision-making. Energy storage technologies have complex and diverse cost, value, and performance characteristics that make them challenging to model, but there is limited guidance about best practices and research gaps for energy storage analysis. This paper reviews the literature and draws upon our collective experience to provide recommendations to analysts on approaches for representing energy storage in long-term electric sector models, navigating tradeoffs in model development, and identifying research gaps for existing tools and data. The review focuses on national-scale models with technological, temporal, and regional detail given their prevalence in planning and policy, though many insights are transferable to other modeling contexts. It also offers guidance to consumers of model outputs on proper use and interpretation based on model strengths and limitations. In particular, this review demonstrates the importance of capturing how the values of energy storage and other resources change as the system composition changes (e.g. with different levels of storage, renewables deployment, and emissions outcomes). These considerations require model detail like high spatiotemporal resolutions and endogenous investments that global integrated assessment models and price-taker frameworks do not typically resolve. Research gaps include linking tools of different resolutions, developing reduced-form representations of value streams, incorporating hybrid energy storage and renewable systems, and representing longer-duration energy storage technologies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available