Journal
OPHTHALMOLOGY RETINA
Volume 4, Issue 7, Pages 737-749Publisher
ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.02.009
Keywords
-
Categories
Funding
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Oxford Biomedical Research Centre (BRC), UK
- ProRetina Deutschland, Bonn, Germany
- BONFOR research program of the University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
- German Ophthalmological Society, Munchen, Germany
- German Research Foundation, Bonn, Germany [GL920-1/1, MU4279/1-1, MU4279/2-1]
- Dr. Werner Jackstadt Foundation, Wuppertal, Germany
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Purpose: To investigate quantitatively lipofuscin-associated fundus autofluorescence in patients with macular and cone/cone-rod dystrophies (MD/CCRDs). Design: Prospective, single-center, case-control study. Participants: Two hundred thirty patients with MD/CCRDs who had undergone genetic testing and 110 control participants without any eye disease. Methods: Participants were examined using quantitative fundus autofluorescence (qAF) imaging with a modified confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope equipped with an internal fluorescent reference (modified Spectralis HRA-OCT; Heidelberg Engineering, Heidelberg, Germany). Mean qAF values were obtained by averaging measurements from an 8-segment ring centered on the fovea (qAF(8)) and compared with controls. Main Outcome Measures: The qAF(8) levels. Results: Elevated qAF(8) values were a frequent finding (n = 105 [45%]) and associated with ABCA4 (n = 73 [70%]), PRPH2 (n = 9 [9%]), CERKL (n = 3 [3%]), PROM1 (n = 2 [2%]), CRX (n = 1 [1%]), and CDHR1 (n = 1 [l%]) mutations. Reduced qAF(8) values were rare (n = 15 [7%]) and found predominantly among patients with MERTK (n = 3 [20%]) and RDH5 (n = 2 [13%]) mutations. Patients with normal qAF(8) values (n = 110 [48%]) showed high genotypic heterogeneity. For various genes including ABCA4, PRPH2, CDHR1, and PROM1, higher qAF(8) measures were associated with specific phenotypes and genotypes. For instance, qAF(8) values were normal in PRPH2-related central areolar chorioretinal dystrophy but increased in PRPH2-related Stargardt-like retinopathy. Accordingly, high qAF(8) levels were associated with specific genetic causes and mutation detection rates in characteristic but genetically heterogenous clinical phenotypes, such as a Stargardt-like flecked fundus, bull's eye maculopathy, or pattern dystrophy. In genetically unsolved cases (16 with elevated, 35 with normal, 7 with reduced qAF values), qAF(8) was used to support or reject ambiguous results of genetic testing, to suggest underlying pathogenic pathways, and to predict disease in otherwise healthy participants. Conclusions: Quantitative fundus autofluorescence imaging revealed characteristic qAF levels in association with certain gene mutations and in participants without detected mutations. These findings indicate that qAF may facilitate differential diagnostics of MD/CCRDs and may offer novel pathogenetic insights that may be of particular value for the assessment of future treatment approaches. (C) 2020 by the American Academy of Ophthalmology
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available