4.5 Article

Heavy metal (Pb) accumulation in metallophytes as influenced by the variations in rhizospheric and non-rhizospheric soils physico-chemical characteristics

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYTOREMEDIATION
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 237-248

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2017.1374333

Keywords

rhizosphere; contamination; heavy metals; metal speciation; metal accumulators

Funding

  1. CV Raman Fellowship for African Researchers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Activities at root-soil interface determine the solubility and uptake of metals by plants. Metal accumulation in plant species (Imperata cylindrical, Cynodon dactylon, Eleucine indica, Gomphrena celosoides, Sporobolus pyramidalis, Chromolaena odorata and Rhynchospora corymbosa) growing on Pb contaminated site as influenced by variations in physico-chemical characteristics, dissolved organic matter (DOM), Pb fractionation and different functional groups (using Fourier Transmittance Infra-red) of rhizospheric and non-rhizospheric soils was assessed. The electrical conductivity (2660-5520 mu s) and Pb concentrations (51390.0-64080.0mg/kg) were more in non-rhizospheric than rhizospheric soils having 276 mu s to 3160 mu s EC and 3289.0 to 44850.0mg/kg Pb. More nutrients, DOM and carbohydrates functional groups (C-O; 1100 -1000 and O-H; 3700-3600) were found in rhizospheric compared to non-rhizospheric soils. The pH was slightly acidic (5.0-5.54) and E. indica with the lowest pH (5.0) accumulated highest Pb concentrations in shoot (8030mg/kg) and root (16380mg/kg) while C. odorata with highest values of pH, P, Ca and Mg in rhizospheric soil accumulated the least (root; 331.6 and shoot: 209.0mg/kg). Pb was more in organic and residual fractions of rhizospheric and non-rhizospheric soils respectively. Reduction in pH, EC coupled with nutrients and DOM availability increased Pb uptake by plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available