4.7 Article

Long-term toxicological effects of persistent luminescence nanoparticles after intravenous injection in mice

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
Volume 532, Issue 2, Pages 686-695

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.07.015

Keywords

Persistent luminescence nanoparticles; PEG functionalization; nanoprobes; chronic toxicology; optical imaging

Funding

  1. French National Research Agency [ANR PEPSI 14-CE-08-0016-01]
  2. DAIP (University of Guanajuato)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ZnGa1.995Cr0.005O4 persistent luminescence nanoparticles offer the promise of revolutionary tools for biological imaging with applications such as cell tracking or tumor detection. They can be re-excited through living tissues by visible photons, allowing observations without any time constraints and avoiding the undesirable auto-fluorescence signals observed when fluorescent probes are used. Despite all these advantages, their uses demand extensive toxicological evaluation and control. With this purpose, mice were injected with a single intravenous administration of hydroxylated or PEGylated persistent luminescence nanoparticles at different concentrations and then a set of standard tests were carried out 1 day, 1 month and 6 months after the administration. High concentrations of hydroxylated nanoparticles generate structural alterations at histology level, endoplasmic reticulum damage and oxidative stress in liver, as well as rising in white blood cells counts. A mechanism involving the endoplasmic reticulum damage could be the responsible of the observed injuries in case of ZGO-OH. On the contrary, no toxicological effects related to PEGylated nanoprobes treatment were noted during our in vivo experiments, denoting the protective effect of PEG-functionalization and thereby, their potential as biocompatible in vivo diagnostic probes. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available