4.6 Article

High-performance, long lifetime chloride ion battery using a NiFe-Cl layered double hydroxide cathode

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 8, Issue 25, Pages 12548-12555

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ta04290k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21671015, U1707603, 21521005]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [BHYC1702B, XK1802-6, XK1803-05]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chloride ion batteries (CIBs) are an example of a promising new emerging rechargeable battery technology, that exhibits large theoretical volumetric energy density performance and good safety. However, unsatisfactory capacity and poor cycling lifetime of the cathode currently hinder the development of CIBs. Herein, we report the use of an Ni2+Fe3+-based layered double hydroxide (LDH) intercalated by chloride ions as a promising cathode material for CIBs. [Ni2Fe(OH)(6)]Cl center dot 1.37H(2)O (NiFe-Cl LDH) exhibits a high maximum capacity of 350.6 mA h g(-1)and a long lifetime of over 800 cycles (at 101.1 mA h g(-1)) at a current density of 100 mA g(-1), which is superior to most currently reported CIB cathodes.In situX-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) andex situX-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) reveal the valency changes of the Fe2+/Fe(3+)and Ni2+/Ni(3+)redox pairs within the metal hydroxide layers of the LDH during electrochemcial cycling.In situXRD reveals that 2D anion diffusion within the LDH results in only similar to 3% structural change. Oxygen K-edge soft X-ray absorption spectroscopy (SXAS) reveals the oxygen atoms within the MO(6)octahedra reversibly participate in the electrochemical reaction. In view of the extensive chemical variation, low-cost, and ease-of-preparation of LDH-based materials we regard LDHs as a promising materials platform for application as cathode materials in chloride ion batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available