4.6 Article

Magnetic lanthanum-doped hydroxyapatite/chitosan scaffolds with endogenous stem cell-recruiting and immunomodulatory properties for bone regeneration

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
Volume 8, Issue 24, Pages 5280-5292

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0tb00342e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Shanghai Sailing Program [17YF1414500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC: 81702167, 81702137]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Generally, the addition of exogenous stem cells and host-to-scaffold immune responses restricts the clinical applications of hydroxyapatite (HA)/chitosan (CS) scaffolds for bone regeneration. To achieve facilitated endogenous tissue engineering, magnetic M-type hexagonal ferrite (SrFe12O19) nanoparticles were incorporated into bone scaffolds to recruit endogenous stem cells. Then, lanthanum incorporation was utilized to regulate host-to-scaffold immune responses and to provide a pro-regenerative environment for recruited endogenous stem cells. Here, we first fabricated and characterized magnetic lanthanum-doped HA/CS scaffolds. The MLaHA/CS scaffolds were demonstrated to be effective at recruiting rat bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (rBMSCs) and modulating host-to-scaffold immune responses by promoting macrophage polarization into the anti-inflammatory phenotype (M2)in vitro. By further examining the underlying mechanism, we found that MLaHA/CS scaffolds could promote the osteogenic differentiation of rBMSCs by upregulating the phosphorylation of the Smad 1/5/9 pathway. When MLaHA/CS scaffolds were implanted into rat calvarial defects, the incorporation of magnetic nanoparticles and lanthanum significantly promoted the new bone regeneration, as revealed by micro-CT assays and histological staining. Our findings suggest that MLaHA/CS shows great potential for use as a cell-free and biocompatible scaffold for bone regeneration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available