4.3 Article

Creating hierarchies of noncitizens: race, gender, and visa categories in South Korea

Journal

JOURNAL OF ETHNIC AND MIGRATION STUDIES
Volume 46, Issue 12, Pages 2497-2514

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1561061

Keywords

Immigrant incorporation; race; gender; class; migration; non-citizenship; visa regimes; categorical inequality; Tilly; South Korea

Funding

  1. 2008 Abe Fellowship - Social Science Research Council
  2. American Council of Learned Societies
  3. Japan Foundation Center for Global Partnership, on Immigrant Incorporation in Ethnic Democracies: Citizenship Regimes and Noncitizen Political Participation in Japan and Korea
  4. Korean Studies Promotion Service of the Academy of Korean Studies [AKS-2018-LAB-2250001]
  5. Laboratory Program for Korean Studies through the Ministry of Education of the Republic of Korea
  6. National Research Foundation of Korea [AKS-2018-LAB-2250001] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Building on Charles Tilly's theory of categorical inequality, this article examines how the proliferation of visa categories created to accommodate labour shortages in South Korea has led to the development of noncitizen hierarchies. Although contemporary immigration policies in liberal democracies do not explicitly exclude particular categories of people based on race and gender, they continue to apply discriminatory measures that reinforce social inequalities. In countries where noncitizens range from migrant labourers to native-born foreign residents, visa categories are critical determinants of a migrant's residency status, eligibility for state-sponsored rights, geographic mobility, and prospects for citizenship acquisition. This article analyzes three levels of interaction betweende factoandde jurecategorical differentiation: (1) the extension of racial, gendered, and class-based meaning to specific visa categories (or, how thede factoinforms thede jure); (2) the institutionalisation of categorical inequality (or, how thede jurehardens thede facto); and (3) the structural effects (or, how thede factoandde jureshape patterns of incorporation). By examining the process by which seemingly race and gender-neutral categories and policies assume meaning and convey power, we are better equipped to explore emergent forms of citizenship and non-citizenship, racial politics, and social hierarchies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available