4.4 Article

The sialyltransferase ST6GAL1 protects against radiation-induced gastrointestinal damage

Journal

GLYCOBIOLOGY
Volume 30, Issue 7, Pages 446-453

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/glycob/cwz108

Keywords

gastrointestinal acute radiation syndrome; intestine; radiation biology; sialyltransferase; ST6GAL1

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infections Diseases [R01AI140736]
  2. National Institutes of Health National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support [CA076056]
  3. National Cancer Institute Cancer Center Support [5P30 CA016056]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

High-dose irradiation poses extreme risk of mortality from acute damage to the hematopoietic compartment and gastrointestinal tract. While bone marrow transplantation can reestablish the hematopoietic compartment, a more imminent risk of death is posed by gastrointestinal acute radiation syndrome (GI-ARS), for which there are no FDA-approved medical countermeasures. Although the mechanisms dictating the severity of GI-ARS remain incompletely understood, sialylation by ST6GAL1 has been shown to protect against radiation-induced apoptosis in vitro. Here, we used a C57BL/6 St6gal1-KO mouse model to investigate the contribution of ST6GAL1 to susceptibility to total body irradiation in vivo. Twelve gray total body ionizing gamma-irradiation (TBI) followed by bone marrow transplant is not lethal to wild-type mice, but St6gal1-KO counterparts succumbed within 7 d. Both St6gal1-KO and wild-type animals exhibited damage to the GI epithelium, diarrhea and weight loss, but these symptoms became progressively more severe in the St6gal1-KO animals while wild-type counterparts showed signs of recovery by 120 h after TBI. Increased apoptosis in the GI tracts of St6gal1-KO mice and the absence of regenerative crypts were also observed. Together, these observations highlight an important role for ST6GAL1 in protection and recovery from GI-ARS in vivo.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available