4.1 Review

Innate immunity for better or worse govern the allograft response

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN ORGAN TRANSPLANTATION
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages 8-12

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000152

Keywords

damage-associated molecular pattern molecules; tissue-resident macrophages

Funding

  1. JDRF [4-2007-1057, 3-2010-792]
  2. ADA [1-13-BS-096]
  3. NIH [U01 AI102427-02, R21 CA169904-01]
  4. DOD [W911QY-09-C-2016, W81XWH-12-2-0037]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review To update knowledge concerning the cause and consequences of the detrimental forms of innate immunity that inevitably occurs in peritransplant period tissue and cellular transplants. In addition, we review the information that a newly discovered, engraftment-promoting, and tolerance-inducing macrophage population is identified and characterized. Recent findings The allograft response mounted by adaptive immune cells is shaped by innate immunity. The early allograft response is uniquely intense as a result of activation of the innate immune response created by ischemia reperfusion injury in organ transplants, delayed revascularization of cell transplants, and hypoxia. Inflammation is created by both cellular 'debris' and cytokines. However, a newly discovered prominent, albeit fragile, tissue-resident, noninvasive, and immunoregulatory macrophage promotes engraftment and tolerance. The role of intracellular 'debris' as well as inflammation in evoking detrimental rejection-provoking peritransplant inflammation is emphasized as well as characterization of a prominent and highly immunoregulatory albeit fragile macrophage population that is tissue-resident and does not circulate is characterized. Summary Opportunity lies in the ability to rein in detrimental peri-transplant inflammation and in the ability to promote the longevity of a subpopulation of highly potent tissue-resident immunoregulatory macrophages.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available