4.7 Article

IonchanPred 2.0: A Tool to Predict Ion Channels and Their Types

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms18091838

Keywords

ion channels; pseudo-dipeptide composition; machine learning method

Funding

  1. Applied Basic Research Program of Sichuan Province [2015JY0100, 14JC0121]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [ZYGX2015J144, ZYGX2015Z006, ZYGX2016J118, ZYGX2016J125, ZYGX2016J126]
  3. Program for the Top Young Innovative Talents of Higher Learning Institutions of Hebei Province [BJ2014028]
  4. Outstanding Youth Foundation of North China University of Science and Technology [JP201502]
  5. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M582533]
  6. Scientific Research Foundation of the Education Department of Sichuan Province [11ZB122]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ion channels (IC) are ion-permeable protein pores located in the lipid membranes of all cells. Different ion channels have unique functions in different biological processes. Due to the rapid development of high-throughput mass spectrometry, proteomic data are rapidly accumulating and provide us an opportunity to systematically investigate and predict ion channels and their types. In this paper, we constructed a support vector machine (SVM)-based model to quickly predict ion channels and their types. By considering the residue sequence information and their physicochemical properties, a novel feature-extracted method which combined dipeptide composition with the physicochemical correlation between two residues was employed. A feature selection strategy was used to improve the performance of the model. Comparison results of in jackknife cross-validation demonstrated that our method was superior to other methods for predicting ion channels and their types. Based on the model, we built a web server called IonchanPred which can be freely accessed from http://lin.uestc.edu.cn/server/IonchanPredv2.0.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available