4.7 Article

Goblet Cells Contribute to Ocular Surface Immune Tolerance-Implications for Dry Eye Disease

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms18050978

Keywords

mucins; antigen; goblet cell; dendritic cells; adaptive immunity; immune tolerance

Funding

  1. NIH [EY11915, EY002520, EY020799, T32 AI053831, NIAID P30AI036211, NCI P30CA125123, NCRR S10RR024574]
  2. Biology of Inflammation Center Baylor College of Medicine
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness, New York, NY, USA
  4. Oshman Foundation, Houston, TX, USA
  5. William Stamps Farish Fund, Houston, TX, USA
  6. Hamill Foundation, Houston, TX, USA
  7. Sid W. Richardson Foundation, FtWorth, TX, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Conjunctival goblet cell (GC) loss in dry eye is associated with ocular surface inflammation. This study investigated if conjunctival GCs contribute to ocular surface immune tolerance. Antigens applied to the ocular surface, imaged by confocal microscopy, passed into the conjunctival stroma through goblet cell associated passages (GAPs) in wild type C57BL/6 (WT), while ovalbumin (OVA) was retained in the epithelium of SAM pointed domain containing ETS transcription factor (Spdef) knockout mice (Spdef(-)/(-)) that lack GCs and are a novel model of dry eye. Stimulated GC degranulation increased antigen binding to GC mucins. Induction of tolerance to topically applied OVA measured by cutaneous delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) was observed in WT, but not Spdef(-)/(-). OTII CD4(+) T cells primed by dendritic cells (DCs) from the conjunctival draining lymph nodes of Spdef(-)/(-) had greater IFN-gamma production and lower Foxp3 positivity than those primed by WT DCs. These findings indicate that conjunctival GCs contribute to ocular surface immune tolerance by modulating antigen distribution and antigen specific immune response. GC loss may contribute to the abrogation of ocular surface immune tolerance that is observed in dry eye.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available