4.2 Review

Circadian clocks, epigenetics, and cancer

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 50-56

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000153

Keywords

cancer; cell cycle; circadian clock; epigenome; metabolism

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Health (NIH)
  2. INSERM (Institut National de la Sante et la Recherche Medicale, France)
  3. KAUST (King Abdullah University of Science and Technology, Saudi Arabia)
  4. Merieux Pharmaceuticals (France)
  5. UC Irvine Chao Family Cancer Center
  6. JSPS
  7. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON AGING [R21AG043745] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  8. NATIONAL INSTITUTE ON DRUG ABUSE [R21DA036408] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review The interplay between circadian rhythm and cancer has been suggested for more than a decade based on the observations that shift work and cancer incidence are linked. Accumulating evidence implicates the circadian clock in cancer survival and proliferation pathways. At the molecular level, multiple control mechanisms have been proposed to link circadian transcription and cell-cycle control to tumorigenesis. Recent findings The circadian gating of the cell cycle and subsequent control of cell proliferation is an area of active investigation. Moreover, the circadian clock is a transcriptional system that is intricately regulated at the epigenetic level. Interestingly, the epigenetic landscape at the level of histone modifications, DNA methylation, and small regulatory RNAs are differentially controlled in cancer cells. This concept raises the possibility that epigenetic control is a common thread linking the clock with cancer, though little scientific evidence is known to date. Summary This review focuses on the link between circadian clock and cancer, and speculates on the possible connections at the epigenetic level that could further link the circadian clock to tumor initiation or progression.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available