4.6 Article

Spiro-OMeTAD or CuSCN as a preferable hole transport material for carbon-based planar perovskite solar cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 8, Issue 25, Pages 12723-12734

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0ta03951a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council Discovery Project [DP190102252]
  2. Centre for Materials Science, Queensland University of Technology (QUT)
  3. QUT postgraduate scholarship
  4. Science and Engineering faculty, QUT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A hole transport layer (HTL) plays the role of extracting hole carriers while improving interfacial contacts of perovskite/carbon in planar heterojunction perovskite solar cells using carbon based electrodes (C-PSCs). For the future application of C-PSCs, the HTL also needs to have good stability and easy processability while maintaining high device efficiency. Herein, we compare the behaviour of the most widely used HTL based on spiro-OMeTAD to the much less studied HTL based on CuSCN in planar C-PSCs. The results show that 14.7% power conversion efficiency (PCE) is obtained for CuSCN based C-PSCs with good reproducibility and negligible hysteresis behaviour. In contrast, the C-PSCs using spiro-OMeTAD show a much lower PCE (12.4%) and significant hysteresis phenomenon. We conduct systematic characterisation of the electronic and energetic properties of the C-PSCs to understand this phenomenon. We find that a more favourable energy level alignment of CuSCN with the perovskite than spiro-OMeTAD leads to a reduced charge injection barrier, which favours a more efficient hole extraction capability, inhibited carrier recombination and reduced ionic capacitance. This in turn leads to better PCE and lower hysteresis for the C-PSCs. Moreover, the CuSCN based C-PSCs also demonstrate better stability against moisture with a high PCE retention ratio of 93% under a humid environment (55-70%) for 80 days without encapsulation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available