3.8 Article

Predicting displacement of bridge based on CEEMDAN-KELM model using GNSS monitoring data

Journal

JOURNAL OF APPLIED GEODESY
Volume 14, Issue 3, Pages 253-261

Publisher

WALTER DE GRUYTER GMBH
DOI: 10.1515/jag-2019-0057

Keywords

deformation prediction; bridge; complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise; kernel extreme learning machine; GNSS monitoring data

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41404008]
  2. Guiding Project of Fujian Science and Technology Program [2018Y0021]
  3. Open Foundation of Key Laboratory for Digital Land and Resources of Jiangxi Province [DLLJ201911]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bridges are critical to economic and social development of a country. In order to ensure the safe operation of bridges, it is of great significance to accurately predict displacement of monitoring points from bridge Structural Health System (SHM). In the paper, a CEEMDAN-KELM model is proposed to improve the accuracy of displacement prediction of bridge. Firstly, the original displacement monitoring time series of bridge is accurately and effectively decomposed into multiple components called intrinsic mode functions (IMFs) and one residual component using a method named complete ensemble empirical mode decomposition with adaptive noise (CEEMDAN). Then, these components are forecasted by establishing appropriate kernel extreme learning machine (KELM) prediction models, respectively. At last, the prediction results of all components including residual component are summed as the final prediction results. A case study using global navigation satellite system (GNSS) monitoring data is used to illustrate the feasibility and validity of the proposed model. Practical results show that prediction accuracy using CEEMDAN-KELM model is superior to BP neural network model, EMD-ELM model and EMD-KELM model in terms of the same monitoring data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available