4.2 Article

Prediction of outcome in internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy for paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: A machine learning approach

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mpr.1576

Keywords

cognitive behaviour therapy; internet; machine-learning; obsessive-compulsive disorder; prediction

Categories

Funding

  1. Jane & Dan Olsson Foundation
  2. Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare [2014-4052]
  3. Swedish Research Council [K2013-61P-22168]
  4. Stockholm County Council [20120167, 20140085]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundThere are no consistent predictors of treatment outcome in paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). One reason for this might be the use of suboptimal statistical methodology. Machine learning is an approach to efficiently analyse complex data. Machine learning has been widely used within other fields, but has rarely been tested in the prediction of paediatric mental health treatment outcomes. ObjectiveTo test four different machine learning methods in the prediction of treatment response in a sample of paediatric OCD patients who had received Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy (ICBT). MethodsParticipants were 61 adolescents (12-17years) who enrolled in a randomized controlled trial and received ICBT. All clinical baseline variables were used to predict strictly defined treatment response status three months after ICBT. Four machine learning algorithms were implemented. For comparison, we also employed a traditional logistic regression approach. ResultsMultivariate logistic regression could not detect any significant predictors. In contrast, all four machine learning algorithms performed well in the prediction of treatment response, with 75 to 83% accuracy. ConclusionsThe results suggest that machine learning algorithms can successfully be applied to predict paediatric OCD treatment outcome. Validation studies and studies in other disorders are warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available