4.0 Article

Clinicopathological and prognostic characterization of oral lichenoid disease and its main subtypes: A series of 384 cases

Journal

MEDICINA ORAL PATOLOGIA ORAL Y CIRUGIA BUCAL
Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages E554-E562

Publisher

MEDICINA ORAL S L
DOI: 10.4317/medoral.23576

Keywords

Oral lichenoid disease; oral lichen planus; oral lichenoid lesion; diagnosis; malignant transformation; prognosis

Funding

  1. Carlos III Health Institute [FIS_PI13/01211]
  2. Basque Government [IT80913]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: To clinicopathologically characterize the diagnosis of oral lichenoid disease (OLD) and its main subtypes: oral lichen planus (OLP) and oral lichenoid lesion (OLL), in order to correctly asses their prognosis. Material and Methods: Ambispective cohort study of 384 patients with diagnosis of OLD, based on pre-established clinical and histopathological criteria. We have analysed 272 (70.8%) women and 112 (29.2%), whose mean age was 57.1+/-11.8 years (range 21-90); minimum follow-up time was 36 months. A specific protocol was designed for this study, where we gathered the data of each patient, including malignant transformation. Results: OLP was diagnosed in 229 cases (77.9%) and OLL in 85 (22.1%). Tobacco consumption was found in 20.3% of the patients and alcohol intake in 41.1%. Liver pathology was present in 10.7% of the cases, thyroid pathology in 11.5%, arterial hypertension in 15.6%, diabetes mellitus in 7.6%, psycho-emotional disorders in 33.3%, skin involvement in 12% and genital involvement in 4.9%. Ten patients (2.6%) developed an oral squamous cell carcinoma, 5 (1.7%) with OLP and 5 (5.9%) with OLL. Conclusions: OLD is a potentially malignant disorder of the oral mucosa which has to be correctly diagnosed as either OLP or OLL, since the risk of malignancy of these subtypes is significantly different.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available