4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Fatigue assessment of non-stationary random vibrations by using decomposition in Gaussian portions

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES
Volume 127, Issue -, Pages 10-22

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2016.05.024

Keywords

Non-stationary random vibrations; Power spectral density; Fatigue strength; Shaker testing; Fatigue damage spectrum; Structural dynamics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a method for determining the decomposition of a non-stationary, random vibration with a non-Gaussian distribution into several stationary portions with Gaussian distributions. The fatigue load of the initial non-stationary signal, and the summarized fatigue loads of the derived Gaussian portions are identical in both a direct comparison and in a comparison of the vibration responses caused by these signals on an arbitrary linear dynamical system. As stationary Gaussian signals can be described by power spectral densities (PSD), the analysis of the dynamical response with its corresponding fatigue load can be switched from time domain to frequency domain with an enormous performance gain regarding numerical computations. Especially, a combination of a realistic non-stationary signal with a large duration (from measurements), together with huge structural dynamics models is hard to analyze numerically in time domain because of enormous computation times. The proposed PSD-based method enables a very efficient numerical analysis in frequency domain. For the estimation of load spectra in frequency domain, well established PSD-based methods can be used, corresponding to Rainflow counting in time domain. This paper gives a detailed introduction to the procedure outlined with associated equations necessary for a numerical solution. The correct modeling of the fatigue damage load is proven by applying the fatigue damage spectrum concept.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available