4.7 Article

Melting of nanoparticles-enhanced phase-change materials in an enclosure: Effect of hybrid nanoparticles

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES
Volume 134, Issue -, Pages 85-97

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.09.045

Keywords

Phase-change material; Hybrid nanofluid; Cavity; Melting; Enthalpy-porosity model

Funding

  1. Dezful Branch, Islamic Azad University, Dezful, Iran
  2. scientific and technological department of the presidential office
  3. Isfahan University of Technology (IUT)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The present paper studies the melting of nanoparticles-enhanced phase-change materials (NEPCM) in a square cavity using the finite element method. The enhancement is based on the hybrid nanofluid strategy. A linearized correlations procedure has been followed to determine the properties of the hybrid nanofluid. The Rayleigh, Prandtl, and Stefan numbers have been fixed at 10(8), 50, and 0.1, respectively. The left wall is kept at a higher temperature T-h = 40 degrees C, the right wall is kept at a lower temperature T-c = 30 degrees C, while the horizontal walls are kept adiabatic. The enthalpy-porosity model is used to simulate the melting of the phase-change materials (PCM). The study is governed by tracing the liquid solid interface by varying the total nanoparticles volume fraction phi = 0-5%, and four different sets of models parameters combinations (Nc, Nv) = (0,0), (5,18), (18,18), (18,5). The results have shown the consistency of the liquid solid phase progress with the available experimental results, i.e. the melting process expedites when the enhancement in the thermal conductivity, which is characterized by Nc, is much greater than the enhancement of the dynamic viscosity. Compared with the available experimental data, hybrid nanoparticles composed of Mg-MgO demonstrate the best fusion performance. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available