4.6 Article

Pushing the limits of the electrochemical window with pulse radiolysis in chloroform

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 22, Issue 26, Pages 14660-14670

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp01948h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical Sciences, Geosciences Bioscience [DE-SC0012704]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pulse radiolysis (PR) enables the full redox window of a solvent to be accessed, as it does not require electrodes or electrolyte which limit the potentials accessible in voltammetry measurements. PR in chloroform has the additional possibility to enable reaching highly positive potentials because of its large ionization potential (IP). PR experiments demonstrated the formation of the (deuterated) chloroform radical cation CDCl3+center dot, identifying it as the source of the broad absorption in the visible part of the spectrum. Results indicated that solutes with a redox potential up to +3.7 Vvs.Fc/Fc(+)can be oxidized by CDCl3+center dot, which is far beyond what is possible with electrochemical techniques. Oxidation is not efficient because of rapid geminate recombination with chloride counterions, but also due to rapid decomposition of CDCl3+center dot which limits the yield of otherwise longer-lived free ions. The rapid, 6 +/- 3 ns, decomposition, confirmed by two independent experiments, means that a solute must be present at a concentration >100 mM to capture >90% of the free holes formed. Addition of ethene removes the broad, overlapping absorptions from ubiquitous (chlorine atom, solute) complexes created by PR in halogenated solvents enabling clear observation of solute cations. The results also unravel the complex radiation chemistry of chloroform including the large reported valueG(-CHCl3) = 12 molecules/100 eV for the decomposition of chloroform molecules.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available