4.3 Article

Direct detection of multiple pesticides in honey by neutral desorption-extractive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MASS SPECTROMETRY
Volume 422, Issue -, Pages 111-118

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2017.09.005

Keywords

Neutral desorption-extractive electrospray ionization; Mass spectrometry; Multiple pesticides; Honey; Direct analysis

Funding

  1. 12th Five-rural Areas of the National Science and Technology Plan Project [2012BDA29801]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31071551]
  3. Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (PCSIRT) [IRT13054]
  4. Science and Technology Planning Project at the Ministry of Science and Technology of Jiangxi Province, China [20151BBG70048]
  5. Advantage Science and Technology Innovation Team Project of Jiangxi Province [20171BCB24002]
  6. Nanchang University Graduate Student Special Innovation Project [cx2016203]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An analytical method was developed and validated for the simultaneous determination of residues of three kinds of organophosphorus insecticides and two kinds of carbamate insecticides in honey using neutral desorption-extractive electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ND-EESI-MS) without any sample pretreatment. The detection limits of the assay ranged from 1.16 to 4.18 ng/g or the studied pesticides. The developed assay was linear over the concentration range of 20.00-1000.00 ng/mL, with correlation coefficients of more than 0.996, and the recoveries ranged between 87.00% and 114.98%, with RSD lower than 6.22% for all pesticides. The matrix effect for all of the pesticides showed signal suppression except for chlorpyrifos-methyl. This ND-EESI-MS method was proved to be effective for the detection of pesticide residues by analyzing eighteen kinds of commercial honey in this study. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available