4.7 Article

Surface roughness of two-frequency elliptical vibration texturing (TFEVT) method for micro-dimple pattern process

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2016.12.011

Keywords

Surface roughness; Two-frequency elliptical vibration texturing method; Micro-dimple pattern

Funding

  1. Yeungnam University
  2. Human Training Program for Regional Innovation and Creativity through the Ministry of Education
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2014H1C1A1066502]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2014H1C1A1066502] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a two-frequency elliptical vibration texturing (TFEVT) method that adds elliptical vibration cutting (EVC) to a conventional texturing (CT) method. The TFEVT method improves the surface' roughness compared to the CT method during a micro-dimple texturing process. Kinematic analysis and a theoretical surface roughness model are presented based on the effect of the tool edge radius. The effect of this radius cannot be neglected since it is nearly equal to the undeformed chip thickness at the micro scale. The replication of the tool edge radius profile, the effect of the material spring back, and the residual error were also considered in the surface roughness model. The surface roughness of a micro-dimple also includes the replication of the tool edge radius profile, which can be determined by using a replication technique. The deflection of material spring back is formulated according to the value of the minimum principal stress in the tertiary deformation zone between the flank face and the machined surface, and the plastic strain value is determined based on elasto-plastic deformation theory. Experimental and simulation results were compared to validate the surface roughness model.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available