3.8 Article

Reverse (brand) anthropomorphism: the case of brand hitlerization

Journal

JOURNAL OF CONSUMER MARKETING
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages 651-659

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JCM-11-2019-3487

Keywords

Brand personification; Brand hate; Brand anthropomorphism; Brand hitlerization; Reverse anthropomorphism

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Although marketer-generated brand anthropomorphism impacts on positive company returns is studied broadly, consumer-generated brand anthropomorphisms that focus on demonizing and hitlerizing brands is not extensively studied. This study aims to examine these consumer interpretations of the evil, its symbols and personifications of brands as evil, with a new concept: reverse brand anthropomorphism. Design/methodology/approach This paper provides a literature review of brand anthropomorphism and the application of the concept of evil. This paper also uses a qualitative analysis with consumer interviews to explore the proposed reverse brand anthropomorphism concept. Findings This study's findings reveal that consumers see corporations as consciously evil, loosely as an embodiment of Adolf Hitler. Consumer interviews points out that corporate brand power aimed at controlling consumer value systems is associated with evil, an evil that secretly aims at possessing consumers and controlling their consumption practices. The findings of this study indicate that consumers also develop their own alternative moral market value systems, ones parallel to religious morality. Although evil imagery is often found distractive and disrespectful by consumers, the younger generation accept it as a new and alternative form of market speech. Originality/value This is the first study to introduces and conceptualize a reverse brand anthropomorphism concept with examples of consumer brand hitlerization semiotics. Further, this study is also the first study to discuss evil in a consumption context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available