4.7 Article

A porcine macrophage cell line that supports high levels of replication of OURT88/3, an attenuated strain of African swine fever virus

Journal

EMERGING MICROBES & INFECTIONS
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 1245-1253

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1772675

Keywords

African swine fever virus; macrophage cell line; ZMAC; vaccine; virus replication

Funding

  1. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BBS/E/1/00007031, BBS/E/1/00007034]
  2. Department of Environment Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) [SE1516]
  3. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  4. Department for international development with United Kingdom (UK) Aid from the UK Government through Global Alliance for Livestock Veterinary Medicines (GALVmed) [OPP1009497]
  5. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation [OPP1009497] Funding Source: Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  6. BBSRC [BBS/E/I/00007031, BBS/E/I/00007034] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main target cells for African swine fever virus (ASFV) replication in pigs are of monocyte macrophage lineage and express markers typical of the intermediate to late stages of differentiation. The lack of a porcine cell line, which accurately represents these target cells, limits research on virus host interactions and the development of live-attenuated vaccine strains. We show here that the continuously growing, growth factor dependent ZMAC-4 porcine macrophage cell line is susceptible to infection with eight different field isolates of ASFV. Replication in ZMAC-4 cells occurred with similar kinetics and to similar high titres as in primary porcine bone marrow cells. In addition we showed that twelve passages of an attenuated strain of ASFV, OURT88/3, in ZMAC-4 cells did not reduce the ability of this virus to induce protection against challenge with virulent virus. Thus, the ZMAC-4 cells provide an alternative to primary cells for ASFV replication.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available