4.3 Review

Muscle-related side-effects of statins: from mechanisms to evidence-based solutions

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN LIPIDOLOGY
Volume 26, Issue 3, Pages 221-227

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOL.0000000000000174

Keywords

creatine kinase; myopathy; statin myalgia

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [NHLBI R01HL098085, NIH/NHLBI R01 HL081893, NIH/NCCAM RC1 AT005836]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review This article highlights the recent findings regarding statin-associated muscle side-effects, including mechanisms and treatment as well as the need for more comprehensive clinical trials in statin myalgia. Recent findings Statin myalgia is difficult to diagnose and treat, as major clinical trials have not routinely assessed muscle side effects, there are few clinically relevant biomarkers and assessment tools for the symptoms, many apparent statin-related muscle symptoms may be nonspecific and related to other drugs or health conditions, and prevalence estimates vary widely. Data thus suggest that only 30-50% of patients with self-reported statin myalgia actually experience muscle pain on statins during blinded, placebo-controlled trials. In addition, evidence to date involving mechanisms underlying statin myalgia and its range of symptoms and presentations supports the hypothesis that there are multiple, interactive and potentially additive mechanisms underlying statin-associated muscle side-effects. Summary There are likely multiple and interactive mechanisms underlying statin myalgia, and recent studies have produced equivocal data regarding prevalence of statin-associated muscle side-effects, contributing factors and effectiveness of common interventions. Therefore, more clinical trials on statin myalgia are critical to the field, as are systematic resources for quantifying, predicting and reporting statin-associated muscle side-effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available