4.7 Article

Numerical simulation and experimental verification of the rock damage field under particle water jet impacting

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING
Volume 102, Issue -, Pages 169-179

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.12.019

Keywords

Particle impact drilling technology; Particle water jet; Rock breaking by impact; SPH-FEM coupling; Rock damage

Funding

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project of China [2011ZX05060-001]
  2. Science and Technology Major Project of CNPC [2015F-1801]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [14CX06084A]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

By impacting and breaking rock with a particle water jet, particle impact drilling technology can accelerate the rate of penetration. To study the dynamic process, damage evolvements, and failure mechanisms of rock under the impact of a particle water jet, the smoothed particle hydrodynamics method (SPH) was coupled with the finite element method (FEM) to combine their advantages. Based on a stochastic algorithm, steel particles built by FEM were dispersed among water built by SPH to construct a new model of a particle water jet that can actually reflect the large-diameter and low-concentratibn features of the solid phase in a particle water jet. To verify the accuracy of the numerical simulation results, indoor experiments of a particle water jet impacting rock were carried out. The simulation results were demonstrated by experimental studies, which indicated that the SPH-FEM coupled Method was able to simulate the rock-breaking process under a particle water jet. The simulation results revealed that rock fragmentation was achieved due to the impact dynamic load and rock softening caused by the stress wave and that the scope of the stress wave had a distinct partial effect. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available