4.7 Article

A nonlinear dynamic uniaxial strength criterion that considers the ultimate dynamic strength of concrete

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMPACT ENGINEERING
Volume 103, Issue -, Pages 124-137

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.01.011

Keywords

Concrete; Strain rate effect; Actual dynamic strength; Physical mechanism; S criterion

Funding

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2016YFC0701104]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51522802, 51421005]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Beijing, China [8161001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The existing test results and semi-empirical equations of the rate-dependent concrete strength have overestimated the actual dynamic strength because they do not distinguish between the actual dynamic strength related to the strain rate effects and the additional resistance caused by inertial effects. However, an ultimate strength of concrete exists at a strain rate exceeding a certain value. This paper proposes a nonlinear dynamic uniaxial strength criterion for concrete based on an analysis of the physical mechanisms governing the strain-rate-dependent behavior of concrete strength. The proposed criterion is able to describe the actual dynamic strength and to reflect the ultimate strength at a high strain rate of concrete. The results from two groups of dynamic uniaxial compressive tests and two groups of dynamic uniaxial tensile tests are used to verify the criterion. Moreover, the recommended physical parameters in the criterion are obtained by analyzing the statistical test results of dynamic uniaxial compression and tension. The recommended parameters can be used in the criterion to study the dynamic strength of concrete when dynamic tests are not feasible, and to predict the dynamic strength at high strain rates when tests are performed at lower strain rates. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available