4.7 Article

Transformation of La0.65Sr0.35MnO3 in electrochemical water oxidation

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 42, Issue 12, Pages 8560-8568

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.11.016

Keywords

Oxygen evolution reaction; Lanthanum strontium manganite; Transformation; Nanolayered manganese oxide; Surface structure; OER mechanism

Funding

  1. Institute for Advanced Studies in Basic Sciences
  2. National Elite Foundation [11/66332]
  3. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Division of Chemical, Geochemical and Biological Sciences [DE-FG02-86ER13622.A000]
  4. FEI under an FEI-UConn partnership agreement
  5. Elite Club

Ask authors/readers for more resources

One of the most promising approaches to produce sustainable energy is hydrogen evolution by water splitting. Since water electrolysis is limited by the high overpotential required for the water oxidation reaction, electrocatalysts are applied to reduce the activation energy necessary for this reaction. However, primary catalysts may chemically convert to other compounds during the reaction. Therefore, the physicochemical and electrochemical changes of catalysts used over a long time need to be investigated in detail to understand the real operating catalyst. In this work, we have observed long-term microstructural changes and amorphization of La0.65Sr0.35MnO3 when used as a catalyst in water -electrolysis at near neutral pH. Microscopic and electrochemical analyses show that the catalyst changed at the molecular level. This study revealed that an entirely different catalyst evolved from the original material over the course of the water oxidation reaction. This observation revealed the importance of the study of the long-term stability and reactivity of La0.65Sr0.35MnO3 toward the water oxidation reaction. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available