4.7 Article

Enhancing the pyridinic N content of Nitrogen-doped graphene and improving its catalytic activity for oxygen reduction reaction

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 42, Issue 47, Pages 28298-28308

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.09.138

Keywords

Nitrogen-doped graphene; Oxygen reduction reaction catalysts; Nitrogen configurations; Active centers

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KGZD-EW-T08]
  2. National Key Research & Development Plan of China [2016YFC0205800]
  3. Ningbo University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrogen-doped graphene (NG) has been extensively studied as an effective candidates of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) catalysts due to its high activities. Whereas, there are still some ambiguities or controversies on the contributions of the three N configurations (pyridinic N, pyrrolic N and graphitic N) for the ORR catalytic activity of NG. Herein, we adopt a facile hydrothermal method followed by the annealing treatment at the different temperatures to tailor the contents of the three N configurations in NG. Then, the contributions of the N configurations on the ORR catalytic activities can be evaluated. The annealing treatment can effectively enhance the content of pyridinic N in NG obtained from the hydrothermal method, and the pyridinic N content increases obviously with the increase of the annealing temperature from 600 degrees C to 800 degrees C. The increase of the pyridinic N content causes an improved catalytic activity of NG toward ORR, which confirms that pyridinic N is the active center of NG for ORR. In addition, the stability of NG also can be improved with the increase of the pyridinic N content. Our work will open up new avenues for the developments of the Nitrogen-doped graphene electrocatalysts of practical significance for ORR. (C) 2017 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available