4.7 Article

Dehydrogenation steps and factors controlling desorption kinetics of a Mg-Ce hydrogen storage alloy

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 42, Issue 33, Pages 21121-21130

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.07.046

Keywords

Mg alloys; Dehydrogenation; Hydrogen diffusion; Mg nucleation; Hydrogen recombination

Funding

  1. Research Fund of the State Key Laboratory of Solidification Processing (NWPU), China [95-QZ-2014]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province, China [2017JM5079]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21406174]
  4. 111 project [B08040]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Experimentally systematical comparisons are carried out in this work to clarify dehydrogenation steps of Mg-based hydrogen storage alloys during the overall desorption process. Different forms of MgH2-CeH2.73 composite powders are prepared by high energy ball milling, partial dehydrogenation and annealing. For partially dehydrogenated samples, the desorption temperature and desorption activation energy decrease significantly considering the fact that primary-precipitated metal Mg phase on the surface of MgH2 can act as nucleate precursors. No significant difference in isothermal desorption kinetics is observed for MgH2-CeH2.73 powders with different grain sizes. However, particle size reduction facilitates desorption at temperatures below 300 degrees C. As minor Ni is distributed on the surface, both onset and peak temperatures in thermal desorption decrease for MgH2-CeH2.73 composite. The reduced activation energy by Ni addition is comparable to the value caused by partial dehydrogenation. Recombination of hydrogen atoms plays an important role during dehydrogenation. The obtains in this work can be expected to provide guidelines to improve desorption kinetics of Mg-based alloys. (C) 2017 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available