4.7 Article

Hydrogen production by crude glycerol steam reforming over Ni-La-Ti mixed oxide catalysts

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 42, Issue 52, Pages 30525-30534

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.10.118

Keywords

Crude glycerol; Hydrogen; Ni-La-Ti mixed oxides; Steam reforming

Funding

  1. National Program for the Development of Basic Sciences (PEDECIBA-PNUD)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The production of H-2-rich gaseous mixtures from steam reforming of crude glycerol was investigated on ternary Ni-La-Ti catalysts. Ni-La-Ti mixed oxides containing 15 wt% of Ni and a La/Ti atomic ratio of 1 were prepared by a coprecipitation method and characterized by a variety of physical and spectroscopic techniques. Samples were calcined in air at 700 degrees C or 850 degrees C for 2 h. Ni-La-Ti samples calcined at 700 degrees C (NiLaTi700) showed a well-defined NiO phase and an amorphous La-Ti mixed oxide, while those calcined at 850 degrees C (NiLaTi850), exhibited two well defined phases of NiO and LaTiO3 perovskite, respectively. NiO was completely reduced to metallic Ni on both solids under pure H-2 at 650 degrees C and the resulting Ni-O phase remained as a separate phase under the steam reforming conditions. Standard catalytic tests for the steam reforming of glycerol were performed at 500 degrees C or 650 degrees C by feeding the fixed-bed tubular reactor with a crude glycerol:water solution containing 30 wt% glycerol. The best results were achieved on NiLaTi700 at 650 degrees C, obtaining H-2 yields and H-2/CO2 molar ratios close to the theoretical values predicted by the steam reforming reaction stoichiometry. A slight activity decay was observed on NiLaTi700 with the progress of the reaction, probably reflecting the formation of small amounts of coke. (C) 2017 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available