4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

23,000 h steam electrolysis with an electrolyte supported solid oxide cell

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 42, Issue 19, Pages 13415-13426

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.072

Keywords

Solid oxide electrolysis cell; Steam electrolysis; Long-term degradation; Air electrode pollution; Cell reversibility; Impedance

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Project SUNFIRE) [01RC1110]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

An electrolyte supported solid oxide cell of 45 cm(2) area was operated in the steam electrolysis mode during more than 23,000 h before scheduled shutdown, of which 20,000 h with a current density of j = -0.9 A cm(-2). The cell consisted of a scandia/ceria doped zirconia electrolyte (6Sc1CeSZ), CGO diffusion-barrier/adhesion layers between electrolyte and electrodes, a lanthanum strontium cobaltite ferrite (LSCF) oxygen electrode, and a nickel/gadolinia-doped ceria (Ni/GDC) steam/hydrogen electrode. Voltage degradation in the operation period with j = -0.9 A cm(-2) was 7.4 mV/1000 h (0.57%/1000 h) and the increase in the area specific resistance 8 m Omega cm(2)/1000 h. The final cell voltage was 1.33 V (at 851 degrees C cell temperature). After dismantling, the cell showed no mechanical damage at electrolyte and H-2/H2O electrode; a small fraction of the oxygen electrode was delaminated. Impedance spectroscopy applied at the steady state DC current density confirmed a degradation dominated by an increasing ohmic term, mainly due to ionic conductivity decay in the electrolyte. In addition, a small non-ohmic and at least partly reversible 02 electrode contribution to degradation was identified, affected by a pollution from the (compressor) purge air. (C) 2017 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available