4.7 Article Data Paper

Towards harmonisation of image velocimetry techniques for river surface velocity observations

Journal

EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCE DATA
Volume 12, Issue 3, Pages 1545-1559

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/essd-12-1545-2020

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. COST Action (European Cooperation in Science and Technology) [CA16219]
  2. Ministero degli Affari Esteri project 2015 Italy-USA [PGR00175]
  3. POR-FESR 2014-2020 (European Regional Development Fund Horizon 2020) [737616]
  4. Departments of Excellence-2018 Program (Dipartimenti di Eccellenza) of the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research, DIBAF-Department of University of Tuscia, Project Landscape 4.0 -food, wellbeing and environment

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since the turn of the 21st century, image-based velocimetry techniques have become an increasingly popular approach for determining open-channel flow in a range of hydrological settings across Europe and beyond. Simultaneously, a range of large-scale image velocimetry algorithms have been developed that are equipped with differing image pre-processing and analytical capabilities. Yet in operational hydrometry, these techniques are utilised by few competent authorities. Therefore, imagery collected for image velocimetry analysis (along with reference data) is required both to enable inter-comparisons between these differing approaches and to test their overall efficacy. Through benchmarking exercises, it will be possible to assess which approaches are best suited for a range of fluvial settings, and to focus future software developments. Here we collate and describe datasets acquired from seven countries across Europe and North America, consisting of videos that have been subjected to a range of pre-processing and image velocimetry analyses (Perks et al., 2020, https://doi.org/10.4121/uuid:014d56f7-06dd-49ad-a48c-2282ab10428e). Reference data are available for 12 of the 13 case studies presented, enabling these data to be used for reference and accuracy assessment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available