4.7 Article

Flexible heat exchanger network design of an ethanol processor for hydrogen production. A model-based multi-objective optimization approach

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 42, Issue 5, Pages 2736-2747

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.10.156

Keywords

Ethanol processor; Energy efficiency; Flexible heat exchanger network; Hydrogen

Funding

  1. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Cientificas y Tecnicas (CONICET)
  2. Agencia Nacional de Promotion Cientifica y Tecnologica (ANPCyT) of Argentina [PICT-2012-1863, PICT-2013-1980]
  3. Universidad Nacional del Litoral (UNL)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work addresses the optimal design of a flexible heat exchanger network using model based optimization, applied to hydrogen production by means of an ethanol steam reforming process. High efficiencies are obtained at different hydrogen production levels ranging from 25 to 100% of a nominal output. System structure, heat exchanger sizing, and operation conditions are simultaneously settled, ensuring both operational feasibility and optimality. The system involves a reforming reactor, vaporization and reheating equipment, combustors, and a heat exchanger network system. A multi-period nonlinear optimization problem (NLP) was formulated to account for the production level distribution. Equipment sizing constraints and structural constraints link the different scenarios. The trade-off between area and efficiency is analyzed using a multi-objective epsilon constraint approach. Models were developed in the GAMS environment. The resulting solutions, for the maximum area case, maintain alcohol combustion at low levels showing efficiencies around 63% in each operational level. Pareto Optimal diagram shows that a 1% reduction of efficiency allows a 50% decrease in total required heat exchanger area by 50%. (C) 2016 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available