4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

A detailed analysis of thermal and chemical compatibility of cathode materials suitable for BaCe0.8Y0.2O3-δ and BaZr0.8Y0.2O3-δ proton electrolytes for solid oxide fuel cell application

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY
Volume 42, Issue 3, Pages 1715-1723

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.07.248

Keywords

Solid oxide fuel cell; Proton-conducting electrolytes; Cathode materials; Thermal expansion; Chemical compatibility; Polarization resistance

Funding

  1. Russian Science Foundation [16-19-00104]
  2. Ural Division of Russian Academy of Science [15-20-3-15]
  3. Russian Science Foundation [16-19-00104] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this work is to identify suitable cathode materials for SOFCs based on proton conducting electrolytes (SOPC-H+) in terms of long-term and thermal cycling stability along with a low polarization resistance. To this purpose a wide variety of materials, well known and new ones, are synthesized and their thermal and chemical compatibility is achieved by the aid of dilatometry study and XRD analysis of the calcined electrode/electrolyte mixtures, respectively. It is found that most of the studied cathodes exhibit significant thermal expansion along with striking chemical interaction with the electrolytes under investigation and despite of their intensive study presented in literature, their applications in H+-SOFCs is still questionable. On the base of experimental data, LaNi0.6Fe0.4O3-delta, La2Ni4+delta and Y0.8Ca0.2BaCo4O7+delta electrode materials have been selected for electrical and electrochemical characterization. It is found that bi-layer electrode with Y0.8Ca0.2BaCo4O7+delta functional layer and LaNi0.6Fe0.4O3 collector exhibits both the lowest polarization and serial resistances in contact with BaCe0.8Y0.2O3-delta electrolyte. (C) 2016 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available