4.2 Review

How methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus evade neutrophil killing

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN HEMATOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages 30-35

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/MOH.0000000000000096

Keywords

cytolysis; inflammation; necroptosis; staphylococcal infection

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health
  2. National Institutes of Health [AI70958, AI044642]
  3. Iowa City Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa, USA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of review Methicillin-resistant strains of the important human pathogen Staphylococcus aureus pose a significant public health threat in the community, as they are easily transmitted, especially prone to cause invasive disease, and infect otherwise healthy individuals. The mechanistic basis for the ability of these organisms to evade the innate immune responses remains incompletely defined. Recent findings The success of pathogens such as S. aureus rests, in part, on their capacity to overcome neutrophil-mediated host defense to establish infection and cause human disease. S. aureus has the potential to thwart effective neutrophil chemotaxis, and phagocytosis, and succeeds in evading killing by neutrophils. Furthermore, S. aureus surviving within neutrophils promotes neutrophil cytolysis, with release of host-derived molecules that promote local inflammation. Here, we provide a brief overview of our understanding of the mechanisms by which S. aureus - including methicillin-resistant S. aureus - avoids neutrophil-mediated host defense and causes disease. Summary Understanding the molecular mechanisms by which S. aureus avoids neutrophil-mediated responses and initiates signaling cascades that culminate in neutrophil lysis will provide insights prerequisite to the development of novel targets for treating staphylococcal infections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available