4.4 Review

Establishing the human naive pluripotent state

Journal

CURRENT OPINION IN GENETICS & DEVELOPMENT
Volume 34, Issue -, Pages 35-45

Publisher

CURRENT BIOLOGY LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2015.07.005

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. New York Stem Cell Foundation (NYSCF)
  2. Flight Attendant Medical Research Institute (FAMRI)
  3. Kimmel Innovator Research Award
  4. ERC-Stg program [StG-2011-281906]
  5. Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
  6. Moross Cancer Institute
  7. Israel Science Foundation Regular research program
  8. ICRF Foundation
  9. Helen and Martin Kimmel Institute for Stem Cell research (HMKISCR)
  10. Benoziyo Endowment fund
  11. HFSPO research grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pluripotency is first assembled within the inner-cell-mass of developing pre-implantation blastocysts, and is gradually reconfigured and dismantled during early post-implantation development, before overt differentiation into somatic lineages ensues. This transition from pre-implantation to post-implantation pluripotent states, respectively referred to as naive and primed, is accompanied by dramatic changes in molecular and functional characteristics. Remarkably, pluripotent states can be artificially preserved in a self-renewing state in vitro by continuous supplementation of a variety of exogenous cytokines and small molecule inhibitors. Different exogenous factors endow the cells with distinct configurations of pluripotency that have direct influence on stem cell characteristics both in mice and humans. Here we overview pluripotent states captured from rodents and humans under different growth conditions, and provide a conceptual framework for classifying pluripotent cell states on the basis of a combination of multiple characteristics that a pluripotent cell can simultaneously retain. We further highlight the complexity and dynamic nature of these artificially isolated in vitro pluripotent states in humans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available