Journal
AMERICAN REVIEW OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
Volume 50, Issue 6-7, Pages 706-712Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0275074020942406
Keywords
COVID-19; evidence-based management; pandemic; evidence
Categories
Funding
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [71633004]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
People worry that many COVID-19 decisions are not evidence based, but applying typical evidence-based management (EBM) in a pandemic seems difficult. A pandemic is characterized by uncertainty, high potential loss, time pressure, and competing values, all posing challenges to EBM. Drawing on events in government responses to COVID-19, this essay focuses on three issues: What should be considered as evidence in pandemic-like situations? How can we make evidence more accessible to decision makers in such situations? And, does evidence have a role in ethical judgments in a pandemic? The essay argues that EBM must be extended to address pandemic-like situations. The evidentiary standard should take into consideration appropriateness, reasonableness, and intuition, paying attention to the stages of a pandemic and the type of errors we want to avoid. In addition, the essay calls for building policy capacity in terms of coproducing and applying evidence in and outside government, as well as strengthening public managers' capacity in evidence-based ethical analysis.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available