4.7 Article

Effect of nanoparticle size and concentration on boiling performance of SiO2 nanofluid

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 107, Issue -, Pages 820-828

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.11.090

Keywords

Pool boiling; SiO2 nanofluids; Heat flux; Heat-transfer coefficient; Nanoparticle coating

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51322601]
  2. Foundation for Innovative Research Groups of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [51421063]
  3. Science Creative Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars in Harbin [2014RFYXJ004]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [HIT. BRETIV. 201315]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The suspension of nanoparticles into transitional heat-transfer media could be an alternative to conventional fluids. The present work experimentally investigates the boiling heat-transfer characteristics of ethylene glycol (EG) and water (H2O) mixture based SiO2 nanofluid under realistic conditions. An EG aqueous solution with a volume fraction of 60% was used as the base fluid owing to its perfect freeze proofing performance. Stable nanofluids were formulated through magnetic stirring and ultrasonic treatment and the effect of the nanoparticle size and concentration on the boiling characteristics of the nanofluids were considered. The results show that the boiling heat-transfer coefficient (HTC) increased when decreasing the nanoparticle diameter from 120 nm to 84 nm. In addition, with the increase of nanoparticle concentration, the HTC first increased rapidly and then exhibited negative growth in the concentration range 0.25-1.00%. Moreover, the HTC deteriorated for nanoparticle volume fractions above 0.75%. Based on the experimental results, the probable mechanism of the boiling heat transfer caused by the nanoparticle coating is qualitatively analyzed. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available