4.7 Article

On the mass transfer performance enhancement of membraneless redox flow cells with mixing promoters

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 106, Issue -, Pages 884-894

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.10.030

Keywords

Microfluidic flow cell; Redox flow battery; Herringbone flow promoters; Mass transfer; Performance enhancement; Membraneless

Funding

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation [147661]
  2. German National Academic Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Membraneless flow cells for electrochemical energy conversion exploit the laminarity of microscale flows to avoid undesirable mixing of reactants. To increase the performance of microfluidic redox flow cells we employ herringbone-inspired flow promoters, thereby increasing convection of each individual species to the electrodes, while minimizing reactant mixing. Polarization curves from electrochemical discharge measurements with a dilute anthraquinone/iron redox system reveal that the presence of flow promoters substantially boosts device performance. Mass transfer enhancement for devices with flow promoters is demonstrated through both higher limiting currents and increased power density; the former is more than double compared to a plain reference microchannel for Reynolds numbers of Re >155. The chaotic mixing effect induced by the flow promoters also becomes apparent in the scaling regimes, the limiting currents are proportional to Re-0.58 instead of Re-1/3 (as for purely laminar flow). Further, we quantify the area specific resistance (ASR) of the electrolyte in our membraneless devices finding a reduction of more than one order of magnitude compared to the ASR of conventional membranes employed in redox flow cells. Overcoming mass transfer limitations, this work highlights the necessity of passive mixers in significantly raising the performance of microfluidic flow cells. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available