4.7 Article

The flow and heat transfer characteristics of superheated steam in concentric dual-tubing wells

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER
Volume 115, Issue -, Pages 1099-1108

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.08.062

Keywords

Heavy oil recovery; Superheated steam; Concentric dual-tubing wells; Thermophyical properties; Numerical solutions

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation Projects of China [51490654]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Projects of China [2016ZX05042, 2016ZX05039]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Offshore Oil Exploitation [2015-YXKJ-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper, a numerical model is presented to estimate the thermophysical propertes of superheated steam (SHS) in concentric dual-tubing wells (CDTW). Firstly, a model comprised of mass, momentum and energy balance equations in the integral joint tubing (IJT) and annuli is proposed for CDTW. Secondly, distributions of temperature, pressure and superheat degree along the wellbores are obtained by finite difference method on space and solved by iteration technique. Finally, based upon the validated model, sensitivity analysis is conducted. The calculated results show that: (1) In CDTW, the difference of injection temperature between the IJT and annuli has a strong influence on the profiles of temperature and superheat degree in wellbores. (2) Temperature in the UT and annuli rapidly tends to be consistent. (3) SHS temperature in each tubing increases with increasing of injection temperature in UT. (4) Superheat degree in UT decreases rapidly near the wellhead, but the superheat degree in annuli has an increase. This study unravels some intrinsic flow characteristics of SHS in CDTW, which has a significant impact on the optimization of SHS injection parameters and analysis of heat transfer law in CDTW. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available